There’re many things that the author can learn from Peterson. As a neutral and keen reader (who wants to learn about Peterson without having to read his works), I enjoy reading both sides. But for this one, I find more explicit biases in the phrasing of the author rather than sounded criticism. It seems as though the author was looking for things to criticize rather than finding a point of constructive dialogue. I think we can all learn from each other. What we no longer needs in this world is an unnecessary violent communication (as if any violence can be justified).